NZERN
 
Join | Login | Help | Search
Library

Home > Library > Article > Urban Advocacy

See Also
•Resource 1
•Resource 2
•Resource 3

NZERN Projects

How can searching be improved? > participate

Urban Advocacy
Community Relations Funding Package 2000-2001

Author
Annabel Riley

Prior Publication
DoC Poneke Area

Copyright
DoC Poneke Area

Department of Conservation
Poneke Area

Report written by Annabel Riley, Community Relations Officer 
Date: 30 July 2001


Contents

Executive Summary
Introduction
Project Description
Scope of network
Target audience
Project objectives
Approach taken
Process

Performance measures and outcomes
Other Outcomes
Project Evaluation Summary 

Discussion - What went well?
Issues 
Recommendations 

Appendix
Evaluation Report
Contact List


Executive Summary

Key Objective:
To broaden conservation awareness within the community through supporting, enabling and networking community conservation / restoration projects.

Performance Outcomes:

        Maintain and develop partnerships/relationships between the department, other agencies and conservation groups

    • Have developed strong contacts with WRC, who helped finance, organise and run events. WRC want to continue this relationship next year.
    • Developed strong links with local Councils e.g Hutt City financed Matiu/Somes boat.

    Establish a co-ordinating group.

    • Developed an informal email co-ordinating group.

    Establish a network of restoration groups from Wellington Region - to become independent of DOC resources.

    • Developed a Wellington Branch of NZERN - a network independent of DOC.
    • Elected 3 representatives on NZERN to act as local contact people.
    • 25 groups have become members and are updating information via the web.]

    Develop a network directory / database.

    • NZERN hosts an on line network directory which can be updated directly by the groups - hardcopies can be printed off.
    • A database of community groups, Councils and iwi working in restoration /conservation has also been developed in Microsoft Word for use by DOC staff.

    Promote the exchange of existing information between DOC, Councils.

    • Through hosting combined events with DOC, WRC and Councils, information has been exchanged on specific work areas with freer working relationship developing.
    • Workshops provided opportunities for agencies to discuss/distribute relevant reports.

    Provide opportunities for community groups to exchange information and expertise.

    • Held 7 events for community groups, DOC, WRC and Councils to get together and share information through talks and demonstrations on relevant topics
    • A total of 70 groups have attended one, some or all of the events.
    • A total of approximately 450 participants have attended events organised by DOC over the last 6 months (this includes those attending more than one event).
    • Through the workshops, many community groups have developed a better understanding and skills of ecological restoration.
    • There is a greater confidence of community groups to seek out professional advice or share their own knowledge.


    Establish and promote a restoration / conservation event.

    • Held a successful Restoration Day with 130 people attending - DOC and WRC have agreed to support a similar event next year.

    Other Outcomes:

    • A greater profile for DOC within Wellington Restoration circles.
    • A greater confidence and morale, with more contact between groups. One evaluation comment of the project was "Boosts enthusiasm and mutual support".

Urban Advocacy Project Report
Community Relations Officer /Community Awareness - Poneke Area Office

Introduction
Late last year (2000) the Department of Conservation was allocated funding for community awareness projects. The aim of funding was to enable the Department to become actively involved in supporting and developing conservation awareness initiatives within the community. The project that is described in the following report fits within the 'urban conservation awareness' category and was funded for a period of 6 months.

Project description
Throughout the Wellington Region over the past 10 years there has been a growth in the number of volunteer community groups adopting an area and beginning the long task of restoration. Over the years some groups have received support and funding from District or City Councils, DOC and increasingly the Wellington Regional Council (WRC).

Through the Community Awareness funding package, the Department saw an opportunity to become more involved in supporting these existing projects by facilitating the development of a network. The network would serve as an ongoing system to co-ordinate and build conservation involvement and awareness in the urban communities of Wellington, Hutt Valley and Kapiti Coast.

A Community Relations Officer, Annabel Riley was employed for a 6 month period to work with a wide range of community groups, Councils and agencies to manage the establishment of a Wellington network of conservation /restoration groups. A requirement of the network is that it would become independent of the Departments resources by the end of June 2001.

Scope of network
The scope of the network has been confined to the Wellington Region urban areas including Wellington City and the increasingly urban Kapiti Coast.

Target audience
The project targeted the existing conservation/ restoration community groups and individuals actively operating in the Wellington Region urban areas. Also involved would be the wide range of other agencies, Councils and stakeholder groups.

The participants in the network would include:

  • the Department of Conservation
  • community groups / individuals involved in conservation/restoration
  • Wellington Regional Council
  • District Councils - Wellington City Council, Porirua City Council, Lower Hutt District Council, Upper Hutt District Council
  • Government agencies
  • other stakeholder groups

Project Objectives
Early on a set of objectives were written to give guidance to the development of the project.

Key Objective
To broaden conservation awareness within the community through supporting, enabling and networking community conservation / restoration projects.


Specific Objectives

    Co-ordination

    • To co-ordinate the development of a network of government agencies, councils and other stakeholders working with community groups on restoration projects.

    Information Exchange

    • To improve the exchange of information / resources /skills between interested parties.

    Community Awareness / participation

    • To promote the involvement of the wider public to take an active role in conservation / restoration projects within their local community.

    Networking

    • To provide opportunities for interested parties to network within their community.

    Environmental Education

    • To provide opportunities for the wider community to learn about local community restoration / conservation projects.

    Direct Energies

    • To focus the energy of groups wanting to become involved or setting up a restoration project.

Approach
In the planning stages of the project, different ways of developing the network were looked at. However due to the short time frame, a requirement for it to become independent of DOC and the existence NZERN (New Zealand Ecological Restoration Network), it become evident that working with NZERN would bring the best sustainable outcome. NZERN had already spent considerable volunteer hours developing the national network and had a well developed website. Mike Peters President of NZERN welcomed the idea that the Wellington network become part of NZERN and we worked together to achieve this.

Part of the approach was to create an identity which was independent of DOC's corporate identity. By doing this other groups, councils and agencies could feel ownership over the network and when DOC was no longer actively supporting the project, the network would continue without an obvious loss of DOC.


Another conscious decision was to involve WRC and councils and community groups early on in the process so that they had the opportunity to be fully involved in the project. All community groups and individuals interested, would be able to do so regardless of the ownership /management of the land.

The approach would be to create many opportunities for community groups, DOC, WRC and councils to get together, share skills, experience and resources and these would be 'hands on' practically based events. Through these opportunities people would be able to get to know one another and build towards the network.

Performance measures and outcomes:

The performance outcomes have been developed from the original job description key result areas.

Maintain and develop partnerships/relationships between the department, other agencies and conservation groups.

Achieved outcome:

  • Developed a particularly strong relationship with WRC who, in effect, acted like partners in organising and running the practical sessions and Restoration Day part of the project. Their input included the following assistance or support:
          • planning and organisational help
          • facilitation at events
          • providing staff on the ground to help run events
          • attendance at practical sessions and meetings
          • providing written resources, 
          • providing resources including food, tents, venue
          • financial assistance with holding events

       

    Near the end of the project a debrief meeting was held and WRC indicated support for the project and a willingness to continue this relationship next year and develop the network further.

  • Less strong relationships but still beneficial were those built with planning /reserve departments of the local councils. In particular Porirua City, Lower Hutt City Council provided support
          • financial support for practical sessions e.g. the cost of the ferry ride to Matiu/Somes return.
          • attending some events
          • providing venues for meetings, supper
          • providing written resources

    The relationships with the 5 councils and WRC were built through an initial letter before Christmas, face to face meetings and an email network which developed.


    Establish a co-ordinating group.

Achieved outcome:

  • An informal co-ordinating group was achieved through the email with staff from District and City Councils, however this did not develop into a regular meeting due to time and work commitments. Through the email network, councils were kept informed of events coming up and any support that may be required.


Establish a network of restoration groups from Wellington

Achieved outcome:

  • We successfully established a network of restoration/conservation groups from Wellington Region.

    The network is to operate as a branch of NZERN (New Zealand Ecological Restoration Network) established 5 years ago in Christchurch. It is to be a self sustaining network of groups from the Wellington Region. However it will require support from DOC for specific tasks.

    Throughout the series of events that have been run over the 6 months as many as 70 groups have taken part. Out of those, 25 have joined as members of NZERN. 

    By joining the groups are able to:

          • be part of a national network of volunteer groups, Councils and Agencies all working towards the ecological restoration of New Zealand.
          • receive regular emails of events/notices of what is happening around the country in terms of restoration.
          • can update their contact details directly on to the combined national web-site.
          • Update events i.e. working parties, regular events.
          • Add articles written by them.
          • Look up ecological information from around the country
          • Find contact details from other groups
          • Attend an annual event for groups involved in ecological restoration work.

As part of the structure of the network and to devolve ownership out into the community 3 people have been elected as Regional Representatives for the network to act as local contact people.


Develop a network directory/database.

Achieved outcome:

  • A network directory has been developed for use by the community on the NZERN web-site. This directory can then be updated directly by the groups and can be kept current. This removes the responsibility of updating the list. WRC have offered to distribute a hard copy of the list once a year.
  • A database has also been developed in Microsoft word for use by DOC staff. There are several documents:
              • A wide list of groups, councils, Iwi and Agencies and interested individuals
              • A list of groups, councils and agencies for label printing, WNCGO - 27583



Provide opportunities for community groups to exchange information and expertise.

Achieved outcome:
Over the 7 months a series of 7 public workshops, practical sessions and day long events were held by DOC as part of the urban advocacy project.

  • Another event was hosted in late July by the Wellington Sustainable Trust and the 20/20 Trust to train NZERN members on how to use the internet and the NZERN site.
  • A total of 70 groups have attended one, some or all of the events.

The events included:

Preliminary workshops - held in February

  • These include 3 preliminary workshops to introduce NZERN and find out what groups want from a network.
            • Kapiti Community Centre, Kapiti - 12 February 2001
            • Approximately 65 people attended including the Kapiti District Council, Wellington Regional Council
            • Hutt City Council Chambers, Hutt City Valley - 13 February 2001
            • Approximately 40 people attended this workshop held at the Council rooms
            • Wellington Regional Council, Wellington - 14 February 2001
            • Approximately 70 people attended the workshop held at the WRC rooms.

Practical Sessions

  • From ideas at Preliminary workshops , we held 3 'practical sessions' on Saturday afternoons through April and May

    The objective of the practical sessions, was to provide an opportunity for experts and community groups to share experience, knowledge and skills. It also provided an opportunity for people to develop contacts and get to know others within the restoration community.

For details of the programmes for each day please see the black accompanying ringbinder.
The practical sessions held were:

            • A Weed Outing!
            • Bartons Bush  - Upper Hutt, 7 April 2001
            • Wet feet wind up
              • Kaitawa Reserve, Paraparaumu, 21 April 2001
            • Seeds, planting, propagation

              Matiu/Somes Island, 5 May 2001

Restoration Day

  • Held a 'Restoration Day' at Tapu Te Ranga Marae - 120 people attended representing approximately 60 groups for a daylong event. The day was organised as a culmination of the Poneke 'urban advocacy' project to highlight the work of volunteer groups involved in ecological restoration. Members of community groups attended from throughout the Wellington Region including many from Kapiti, Horowhenua and the Wairarapa. Please read media releases, and newsletter in black file for more information.

Establish and promote a restoration / conservation event.

Achieved Outcome:

  • The Restoration day was held on Saturday May 26, as discussed above. This day is proposed to become a regular annual event in the restoration calendar. This year the day was held in May to fit within the project timing. Next year the day may occur on another day yet to be decided. An indication of either September or March-April. WRC have indicated a willingness to take part in hosting/organising this events.
  • A yearly workshop in each city or district has been suggested as an alternative to the Restoration Day, which has a regional focus. This would involve 5 individual workshops focused on the needs of the groups in each area and would create a more local perspective. An impact of this would be the extra work involved - they could however be integrated with proposed workshops for next year.

Promote the exchange of existing information between DOC, councils.

Achieved Outcome:

  • By running a series of practical sessions and the Restoration Day we promoted the exchange of information. At each event members of the community, DOC and WRC staff gave talks on specialist topic areas.
  • In conjunction with the talks and demonstrations, displays were erected and pamphlets/ reports distributed. For example, John Sawyer of DOC gave a talk on Conservation /Threatened Plants at the Restoration Day and distributed information to all those who attended. At the Weed Workshop John had the opportunity to sell some 'Weed Atlas' and discuss the work DOC was involved with in Weed Surveillance  
  • A valuable part of the events was the opportunity for people to informally exchange information between themselves, swap phone numbers and arrange further meetings. This has been a good spin off the event.
  • There is a greater level of understanding of where to find information from agencies and who to talk to about the specific information often required.

Other Outcomes

  • A greater profile for DOC within Wellington Restoration circles.
  • A greater confidence and morale of groups in general with more contact between groups.
  • A greater confidence of the community groups to seek out professional advice or share their own knowledge.
  • A better understanding and skills of ecological restoration through practical workshops.

Evaluation Results

  • 40 out of the 80 people who attended the Matiu / Somes Island trip completed written questions with very positive results. Please see the appended evaluation report from the Matiu/Somes Island trip, which asks respondents to comment on both the overall practical sessions and specifically the Matiu/Somes Island trip.


In what ways has the project to date been of benefit to you?

      Comments received:
      "Boosts enthusiasm and mutual support"

      One person commented after the weed workshop:
      "The workshops emphasis that you are not alone, it can be a lonely out there. It is good to see that other people are doing the same thing"

      "Yes - as a leadership encouragement exercise"

      "Very very positive - chance to get together with people with some interests and expertise to benefit from"

  • Further evaluations were completed over the telephone with 6 key community people who have been involved in the project and attended the restoration day. The respondents were asked to respond to a set of questions. The respondents all gave positive comments about the Restoration Day.

Was the Restoration Day beneficial to your group - in what ways?
The reoccurring themes were:

      Networking
      Workshops - developing skills
      Reaffirming for groups that they are on the right track

      Stan Butcher of Lower Hutt Forest and Bird said" there was an air of excitement"
      Colin Ryder of Friends of Mana Island / Forest and Bird said " I have got re-inspired!"


Discussion - What went well?

  • This project was a new idea that had not been run before. It was very important to have a process which brought people into the project and involved them in an active way in the network.
  • Working with NZERN and Mike Peters to develop the network. NZERN have had considerable experience in working with restoration groups and have a well-developed web site. Mike Peters worked very hard with us on the project (visiting Wellington twice in his own time) galvanising a lot of enthusiasm for the network.
  • We gained

    Keywords
    NZERN  Department of Conservation 

    Updated 21/11/2008 4.11AM by PIPI4